This Day in History: 9 April 1684

This Day in History 9 April 1684

Two Mary Corbets


A Name Called Twice

On 9 April 1684, the name Mary Corbet was spoken twice in the Old Bailey.

Not once.

Twice.

Two women stood before the court.

Two different crimes.

Two separate lives.

And yet—

The same name.


The First Mary Corbet: The Counterfeiter

The first Mary Corbet stood accused of a crime that struck at the very heart of the kingdom:

👉 Counterfeiting the King’s coin

She had been seen:

  • Melting pewter, copper, and base metals
  • Pouring them into moulds
  • Producing false shillings and sixpences

Worse still—

Others admitted they had distributed the coins on her behalf.

The evidence was overwhelming.


A Crime of Treason

In modern terms, this was fraud.

In 1684—

It was High Treason.

To counterfeit coin was to undermine:

  • The Crown
  • The economy
  • The stability of the realm

The verdict:

👉 GUILTY

The sentence:

👉 To be burnt to death


The Second Mary Corbet: The Servant

Then—

The name was called again.

Mary Corbet.

But this was another woman entirely.

A maidservant.

Her crime was quieter.

More hidden.

And, in its own way, more disturbing.


A Death in Secret

She was accused of murdering her newborn child.

The court heard that she had:

  • Given birth in secret
  • Denied her pregnancy
  • Concealed the delivery

The child was found:

👉 Locked inside a small trunk


Her Defence

She admitted placing the child in the trunk.

But claimed:

👉 The baby had been stillborn

She insisted:

  • Another woman had been present
  • The child was already dead

But that witness testified:

  • She had heard no cries
  • She had no knowledge of the birth at all

And crucially—

Mary Corbet had denied being with child throughout.


The Judgment

Even if the child had been born dead—

The court reasoned:

👉 Concealing the birth
👉 Locking the body in a trunk

Was itself enough to condemn her.

The verdict:

👉 GUILTY OF MURDER

The sentence:

👉 Death by hanging


A Shared Fate

And so—

On the same day:

  • One Mary Corbet was condemned to burning
  • Another Mary Corbet was condemned to hanging

Two women.

Same name.

Different crimes.

Same end.


A Twist in the Record

Yet the story refuses to settle.

Months later, in July 1684, a General Pardon was read before the court.

Among the names listed:

👉 Mary Corbet

But which one?

  • The counterfeiter?
  • The servant?
  • Or another entirely?

The records do not tell us.


Why This Case Matters

This is not just a story of crime.

It is a story of:

  • Identity
  • Record-keeping
  • And the limits of history itself

Two women stood under the same name.

Both condemned.

And yet—

History leaves us with a question it cannot answer:

👉 Which Mary Corbet died?


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

Published by The Sage Page

Philosopher

Leave a comment