This Day in History: 20 January 1690 — Elizabeth Deacon and the Death of Mary Cox

On Monday 20 January 1690, events unfolded inside a household in St Michael Wood Street that would later be exposed as one of the most prolonged and brutal cases of domestic cruelty heard at the Old Bailey.

Elizabeth Deacon, wife of Francis Deacon, a whipmaker, was tried for the wilful murder of her servant maid, Mary Cox, a girl of about seventeen years of age.

The beginnings of suspicion

The chain of violence began when Deacon discovered that Mary Cox had a shilling in her possession. Demanding to know how she came by it, the girl explained that she had received sixpence from Mrs Baker and sixpence from Susannah Middleton.

Her mistress did not believe her.

On that same Monday, Deacon ordered the girl to be tied to the bedpost and whipped severely. Two apprentice witnesses — Edward Newhall and Thomas Albrook — later testified to what followed.

Escalation

When the maid later denied wrongdoing, Deacon’s anger intensified. She struck her servant two or three times with a whip, then commanded that she be tied again and beaten so violently that the girl cried out “Murder.”

To silence her, Deacon covered the girl’s mouth with her hand.

The cruelty did not end there.

On the following Saturday, Deacon bound Mary Cox by the neck and heels, tied her once more to the bedpost, and burned her neck, shoulders, and back with a fire poker. She then struck her on the head with a hammer, forcing her to confess to being involved with thieves who supposedly planned to rob her master’s house during Bristol Fair.

The next Monday — the day before the girl died — Deacon took her servant before a Justice of the Peace, where the same confession was repeated under the shadow of violence already inflicted.

Neglect and death

After this, Deacon showed no pity.

When Mary Cox became seriously ill, she was denied food, comfort, and care. Witnesses heard her mistress say:

“Hang her, hang her.”

She claimed the girl had the pox, and refused to provide assistance, asking, “Who can do any thing for such a wretch?”

A surgeon later testified that the wounds and stripes contributed directly to her death, alongside illness brought on by previous weakness.

Mary Cox died shortly afterwards.

The defence

At trial, Elizabeth Deacon attempted to extenuate her crime, alleging that the maid was dishonest, obstinate, and associated with thieves. She claimed the punishment was for opening her dressing box.

She produced witnesses who spoke favourably of her upbringing, but none could contradict the overwhelming testimony of violence.

One witness suggested the girl had complained of stomach pains and headaches before the beatings, or that she had made herself ill by eating ice cakes and apples, but the jury found these explanations meaningless in light of the evidence.

Verdict and sentence

The jury returned a clear verdict:

Guilty of wilful murder.

Elizabeth Deacon was sentenced to death.

However, the sentence was respited, as she was found to be pregnant — a legal provision that delayed execution but did not overturn the conviction.

Why this case matters

This case exposes the extreme vulnerability of servants in early modern London, particularly young women living under absolute household authority.

It also demonstrates:

  • the weight given to apprentice testimony,
  • the court’s recognition of sustained cruelty, not just fatal blows,
  • and the limits of maternal reprieve within capital punishment.

For Mary Cox, 20 January 1690 marked the beginning of a suffering that would soon end her life.
For Elizabeth Deacon, it marked the moment private brutality became public crime.

Source

  • Elizabeth Deacon, Old Bailey Proceedings, 26 January 1690, offence dated 20 January, case ref t16900226-1.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Advice of the Day: Trolley Psychology

“Always take the biggest trolley so the shopping feels smaller.”

The Sage

The Sage understands that shopping is not about need, budgeting, or restraint — it’s about perception. His advice today is therefore rooted firmly in visual trickery: “Always take the biggest trolley so the shopping feels smaller.”

According to The Sage, a half-empty trolley is a thing of beauty. It whispers reassurance. It says, “I’m barely buying anything,” even as it quietly absorbs family-sized crisps, emergency biscuits, and something frozen you don’t remember choosing. A small basket, by contrast, judges you immediately and fills up far too quickly, forcing uncomfortable self-reflection by the cheese aisle.

The Sage insists this technique also works psychologically at the checkout. A vast trolley with space left over creates the illusion of control, moderation, and good life choices — regardless of what’s actually inside. Remember: it’s not about what you buy, it’s about how empty the trolley looks while you’re doing it.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Quote of the Day: Loyalty in Football is Rarely Logical

In football, loyalty survives reason — and that is why it lasts.
— The Sage

The Sage has long suspected that football loyalty cannot be explained without doing it a great disservice. Reason would have supporters change allegiance after a bad season, a poor decision, or a decade of disappointment. And yet they don’t. Scarves are kept, seats are returned to, and hope stubbornly refuses to pack its bags. To The Sage, this is not irrationality — it is devotion.

He observes that loyalty in football is rarely logical. It survives defeats that would end most sensible relationships. But that is precisely why it endures. Loyalty, he says, is not built on outcomes but on identity. A club becomes part of who you are, not because it wins, but because it stays — and so do you.

With quiet admiration, The Sage reminds us that loyalty outlasting reason is not a flaw but a strength. In football, as in life, some of the most meaningful commitments persist precisely because they are not constantly renegotiated. They endure storms, mockery, and disappointment — and in doing so, they become something deeper than choice: they become belonging.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Advice of the Day: Professional Standards

“A good window cleaner always leaves at least one streak.”

The Sage

The Sage has always distrusted perfection, particularly when it comes to windows. His advice today reassures homeowners everywhere: “A good window cleaner always leaves at least one streak.”

According to The Sage, a completely spotless window is suspicious. It suggests shortcuts, dark arts, or someone who stayed far too long making eye contact with your net curtains. A single streak, however, proves authenticity. It shows a human was present — someone who wiped, stepped back, nodded thoughtfully, and decided it was “near enough.”

The Sage also notes that streaks serve a practical purpose. They help you locate the window later, reassure you that money has changed hands, and give you something to complain about while secretly knowing you’d have done a worse job yourself. True professionalism, he insists, is not about flawless results — it’s about leaving just enough evidence to avoid questions.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

This Day in History: 18 January 1694 — John Edwards and the Broad Cloth Theft

On 18 January 1694, a tradesman named John Edwards, a plasterer of Aldgate Parish, took part in a theft that would ultimately cost him his life.

Alongside others, Edwards was indicted for felony, accused of stealing forty yards of white broad cloth belonging to John Evans. Broad cloth was among the most valuable textiles of the period, used for coats and outer garments, and its theft was treated as a serious crime.

The offence

The indictment stated that the cloth was stolen on 18 January. When brought before the court, Edwards did not deny his involvement. His defence was limited and unconvincing.

He claimed that the cloth had been left in his care by one Henry Oxton, who, he said, was “now in Their Majesties Service.” Crucially, Edwards could not prove this claim, nor produce any witness to support it.

The court was unconvinced.

His co-accused — J– S– and Richard Colehampton — were found not guilty. Edwards alone bore the full weight of the charge.

Verdict

The jury found John Edwards guilty of felony.

In the legal climate of the 1690s, theft of valuable cloth crossed the threshold into capital crime. Edwards was condemned to die.

Awaiting death

Following sentence, Edwards was held in Newgate Prison, where he was visited repeatedly by the Ordinary of Newgate, whose duty was to prepare the condemned for death.

The Ordinary’s published account provides a rare and intimate glimpse into Edwards’ final weeks.

Edwards was 25 years old, and by trade a plasterer. He openly confessed:

“He denied not that he joined with others in stealing broad cloth, and that he had 25 shillings of the money for which it was sold.”

When asked why he wept, Edwards replied:

“For his sins.”

He told the Ordinary that he now hated sin more than he had loved it, and declared that if his life were spared, he would return to his honest trade and never again commit an unlawful act.

Execution at Tyburn

There would be no reprieve.

On Wednesday 28 February 1694, John Edwards was taken from Newgate to Tyburn, along with six other condemned men. Before execution, he prayed, acknowledged God’s justice, and showed visible penitence.

The Ordinary recorded that Edwards:

  • Wept greatly
  • Acknowledged the justice of his punishment
  • Died penitently

After prayers were concluded, the cart drew away, and Edwards was executed.

Why this case matters

John Edwards’ story illustrates the brutal certainty of late-seventeenth-century justice:

  • Theft of valuable goods could still mean death
  • Only one participant needed to be convicted for the sentence to fall
  • Expressions of repentance did not mitigate punishment, only shaped how death was recorded

It also shows how Old Bailey cases did not end at verdict. Through the Ordinary’s Accounts, we can trace the condemned from crime, to confession, to scaffold — a rare continuity in early modern criminal history.

For John Edwards, 18 January 1694 marked the beginning of the end.

Sources

  • John Edwards et al., Old Bailey Proceedings, offence dated 18 January 1694, case ref t16940221-14
  • A True Account of the Behaviour, Confession, and Last Dying Speeches…, Ordinary of Newgate, executions at Tyburn, 28 February 1694 (OA16940228)

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Quote of the Day: Resilience in its Most Recognisable Form

Football is proof that hope can be rebuilt every Saturday.
— The Sage

The Sage has always been quietly impressed by football supporters. Week after week, regardless of past disappointments, they return with hope freshly patched together. Results fade, defeats are absorbed, and by the following Saturday optimism is once again carefully unpacked, shaken out, and worn proudly. To The Sage, this is not foolishness — it is resilience in its most recognisable form.

He notes that football mirrors life in this way. Setbacks are rarely final, and belief has an extraordinary capacity for renewal when given time, routine, and a shared ritual. The Sage finds something deeply human in the act of turning up again, knowing full well how last time ended — yet choosing hope anyway.

With his usual dry warmth, The Sage suggests that football teaches us how to begin again. Not dramatically, not perfectly, but regularly. Each Saturday offers a small rehearsal for optimism: proof that disappointment doesn’t end hope — it merely postpones it until kickoff.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Advice of the Day: Cold Water Strategy

“Wait until everyone else is swimming before asking if it’s cold.”

The Sage

The Sage believes that swimming is as much a social experiment as it is a physical activity. His advice today reflects this belief perfectly: “Wait until everyone else is swimming before asking if it’s cold.”

According to The Sage, asking too early only leads to hesitation, complaints, and dangerous amounts of thinking. But once others are already submerged — shivering bravely and pretending they’re fine — the question becomes purely academic. At that point, the answer no longer matters, because social pressure has done the hard work for you.

The Sage explains that this technique works everywhere: beaches, lakes, outdoor pools, and even hotel spas where dignity has already been abandoned. By the time you ask, everyone else has committed, and you can simply nod, smile, and lower yourself in while muttering, “Oh… that is brisk.” Wisdom, he insists, is knowing when it’s too late to back out.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

This Day in History: 17 January 1681 — Elizabeth Wigenton and the Murder of Her Apprentice

On Monday 17 January 1681, the Sessions of the Old Bailey were finally held, having been postponed the previous Wednesday due to sittings at Guildhall. Among the proceedings that day was a case of exceptional cruelty.

Elizabeth Wigenton, of Ratcliff Parish, was tried for the murder of a girl about thirteen years of age, who was bound to her as an apprentice.

The offence

Wigenton was a coat-maker by trade. She had set the young girl to work on a piece of sewing, but found the workmanship unsatisfactory. In response, she beat the child severely.

This, however, did not satisfy her anger.

Wigenton then escalated the punishment. She went and fetched a bundle of rods, and arranged for a man to hold the girl while she carried out further violence. The child was bound, helpless, and subjected to a prolonged whipping.

The original account records the severity in stark terms:

“She whiped her so unmercifully, that the blood ran down like rain.”

Even then, Wigenton would not stop. She could not be persuaded to desist until the girl, overcome by pain and distress, fainted away with crying. From the injuries inflicted upon her, the child died shortly afterwards.

The trial

When brought before the court, Wigenton offered little in her own defence. She did not deny the beating, nor dispute the facts as laid before the jury.

Her only statement was:

“That she did not think to kill her.”

Evidence was then given that Wigenton was widely known among her neighbours as a cruel woman, establishing that this act was not an isolated lapse, but part of a recognised pattern of behaviour.

Verdict

The jury reached a clear conclusion.

Elizabeth Wigenton was found guilty of wilful murder.

In the legal context of 1681, this verdict carried only one consequence. Although the sentence is not repeated in the extract, the punishment for wilful murder was death.

Why this case matters

This case exposes the dark underside of apprenticeship in early modern London. Apprentices lived within households, subject to the authority and temperament of their masters and mistresses, with little oversight. Abuse could remain hidden until it ended in tragedy.

It is also notable for involving:

  • A female defendant in a murder case
  • The killing of a child apprentice
  • Sustained, deliberate cruelty rather than a single act of violence

For Elizabeth Wigenton, 17 January 1681 marked the moment when private brutality became public crime — and when the law intervened with its most severe judgment.

Source

  • Elizabeth Wigenton, tried at the Old Bailey, 17 January 1681, for the wilful murder of her apprentice.
    Original Proceedings text as supplied; case reference t16810117-1.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Quote of the Day: The Comfort of Collective Suffering

Football teaches patience: ninety minutes to discover what shouting never changed.
— The Sage

The Sage has always enjoyed football, though not always for the reasons others do. He watches the game with an amused calm, noting how crowds invest enormous emotional effort into events entirely beyond their control. For ninety minutes, voices rise, opinions harden, and advice is generously offered — none of which, he quietly observes, alters the outcome in the slightest.

Rather than mocking this ritual, The Sage finds something oddly beautiful in it. Football becomes a shared exercise in patience, frustration, and hope. It teaches us how deeply people care, even when caring makes no practical difference at all. The shouting, he says, isn’t about influence — it’s about belonging, release, and the comfort of collective suffering.

In the end, The Sage suggests that football’s greatest lesson isn’t strategy or skill, but acceptance. You watch, you feel, you shout — and then you let go. The game ends exactly as it was going to, and life carries on. Learning this, he believes, is patience in its most enthusiastic form.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Advice of the Day: Emergency Storage

“A hat is just a bowl that follows you around.”

The Sage

The Sage has always believed that people underestimate hats. To the untrained eye, they are merely decorative head coverings. To the wise, they are portable solutions waiting for a problem. His advice today is therefore both practical and deeply misleading: “A hat is just a bowl that follows you around.”

According to The Sage, a hat’s true purpose is revealed only in moments of need. Spare change, loose biscuits, emergency grapes, mysterious screws you’ll definitely need later — all belong in the hat. The Sage himself once carried an entire lunch, three keys he didn’t recognise, and what he believes was half a candle, all without removing it from his head.

Naturally, he advises restraint. Not everything should go in the hat, particularly liquids, pets, or anything that wriggles. But in times of crisis, when pockets fail and hands are full, remember this wisdom: a hat is not fashion — it’s preparedness. And if anyone questions what you’re doing, simply tell them it’s “a system.”

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC