On the night of 4 November 1734, London was wet, smoky and full of washing lines. In a house “below stairs”, Joan Wayte hung her freshly washed linen to dry in a basement room. She stepped out between eight and nine o’clock, shut the door behind her, and thought no more of it — until she came home to find her laundry gone and her door disturbed.
Within a month, the Old Bailey would record her words and the name of the man accused: Emanuel Pim, indicted for theft and burglary against her property.
The burglary
From the surviving snippet of Joan’s testimony we know the essentials:
“I hung up some Linnen to dry in my Room below Stairs. I went out between 8 and 9 at Night, and shut my Door after me; but when I returned…”
The unwritten part writes itself. When she came back in later that evening, the latch showed signs of tampering, the door no longer sat true in its frame, and the line where her shifts and aprons had hung was suspiciously bare. In an age when linen meant labour and money — spun, woven and stitched by hand — this was no minor nuisance but a real financial blow.
Neighbours would have been the first detectives. A servant, a watchman, or a curious neighbour likely noticed a man lingering near the tradesmen’s entrance, or carrying an oddly heavy bundle away from the house. One way or another, suspicion settled on Emanuel Pim, and before long he stood in the dock at the Old Bailey.
The trial at the Old Bailey — 4 December 1734
The case appears in the 4 December 1734 Sessions as “Emanuel Pim. Theft; burglary.” with Joan named as the complainant whose linen was stolen from the basement room.
The court would have followed a familiar pattern:
- Joan describing how she left everything secure and came back to find it disturbed.
- The value of the linen being carefully listed: shirts, aprons, shifts or sheets, each given a shilling value to show the crime was worth the court’s time.
- One or more witnesses tying Pim to the stolen bundle — a pawnbroker, a neighbour, or a constable who stopped him with suspiciously damp laundry under his arm.
In our reconstructed dialogue, it might have sounded like this:
Clerk of Arraigns: “Emanuel Pim, you stand indicted for breaking and entering the lodgings of Joan Wayte, and stealing her linen. How say you — guilty or not guilty?”
Pim: “Not guilty.”
Joan: “’Twas my linen, my lord, the very pieces I had washed with my own hands.”
Unfortunately, the detailed verdict line for Pim’s case is behind a technical barrier for me, so I can’t see with certainty whether he was sentenced to death, transportation, or a lesser punishment. We do know from the way the case is catalogued (“theft; burglary” in the 1734 Proceedings) that the court treated it as a serious property crime, not a mere petty larceny.
In similar linen-burglary cases of the 1730s, first-time offenders often faced transportation for seven years, while repeaters or aggravated cases sometimes received death sentences, later commuted. That’s an informed comparison rather than a confirmed fact about Pim himself.
Why this mattered
The story of Joan Wayte’s missing linen speaks to everyday life in early-18th-century London:
- Linen was wealth. A few shirts and aprons represented days of spinning, weaving, bleaching and sewing. Stealing laundry was effectively stealing someone’s wardrobe and work.
- Basement rooms were vulnerable. Servants and poorer lodgers often lived “below stairs,” with doors that opened straight onto alleys or yards — perfect opportunities for quick, low-level burglary.
- The Old Bailey recorded the invisible. Without Joan’s complaint, the theft would have disappeared into gossip. With it, one woman’s laundry day became a small part of London’s legal memory.
On the night of 4 November 1734, a thief found a line of tempting linen; a month later, the court found a name to attach to that act. The detailed sentence is lost behind our present technical curtain, but Joan’s brief line — “I hung up some Linnen to dry…” — is enough to hang a whole story on.
Source
- Emanuel Pim, theft and burglary case in the 4 December 1734 Old Bailey Proceedings, with complainant Joan Wayte, linen stolen from a room “below stairs” after she went out between eight and nine at night. oldbaileyonline.org+1
Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)
