This Day in History – 20 May 1728

Execution at Tyburn: Mary Hendron & Margaret Pendergrass

On this day in 1728, Mary Hendron and Margaret Pendergrass were executed at Tyburn for their part in a deeply troubling case involving the coercion and exploitation of a young woman, Sibble Morris. Though they did not act alone, the law ultimately fell most heavily upon them.

The Victim: Sibble Morris

At the heart of the case was Sibble Morris, a young woman whose vulnerability was ruthlessly exploited. Evidence presented at trial suggested that she was lured under false pretences, manipulated, and effectively delivered into the hands of others against her will.

Accounts indicate that Morris resisted her situation, and her distress became a central feature of the prosecution’s case. Her testimony painted a picture not of consent, but of pressure, intimidation, and calculated deceit, carried out by those she might reasonably have trusted.

The Scheme

Mary Hendron and Margaret Pendergrass were portrayed as active facilitators in the plot. Rather than being peripheral figures, they were said to have:

  • Encouraged Morris into their company
  • Misled her about the circumstances she was entering
  • Assisted in delivering her into a situation where her autonomy was stripped away

The crime was not a moment of impulse, but something that appeared pre-arranged and deliberate—a scheme in which Morris was treated as a means to an end.

The Man Who Escaped the Gallows

Crucially, the case also involved a male accomplice, widely understood to be the principal actor in the intended outcome of the plot. However, in a striking turn, he was acquitted at trial.

This outcome reflects a recurring pattern in early modern prosecutions:

  • Evidentiary thresholds could differ sharply between defendants
  • Juries were sometimes reluctant to convict where intent was less clearly proven
  • Women, particularly those seen as morally suspect, could be judged more harshly when cast as enablers of vice

While the man’s role appeared central to the scheme, the jury ultimately found insufficient grounds to convict him of the capital charge—leaving Hendron and Pendergrass to bear the full weight of the law.

Trial and Conviction

At the Old Bailey, the prosecution emphasised the premeditation and coordination involved. The two women were depicted not as passive followers, but as knowing participants who helped orchestrate the events.

The jury agreed.

Both Hendron and Pendergrass were found guilty and sentenced to death—a punishment reflecting not only the crime itself, but the perceived moral corruption underlying it.

Execution at Tyburn

As was customary, the condemned women were carried from Newgate to Tyburn in a public procession, watched by crowds drawn to the spectacle.

At the gallows, they were given time for prayer and final reflection. Contemporary accounts suggest they acknowledged their fate with outward solemnity, urged to repentance by attending clergy.

Shortly thereafter, both were hanged.

Context and Reflection

This case reveals much about the justice system of the time:

  • Coercion and exploitation, especially involving women, were treated with severe punishment
  • Public morality played a powerful role in determining guilt and sentencing
  • Outcomes could be uneven, with accomplices treated very differently depending on how their roles were perceived

The execution of Hendron and Pendergrass stands as a stark example of how the law sought to punish not only actions, but the perceived moral failings behind them.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Advice of the Day: Choosing a Football Team to Support

Don’t waste time researching teams—simply support whichever one causes you the most emotional instability.

the sage

Choosing a football team is often treated as a lifelong commitment, rooted in geography, family tradition, or a vague understanding of the sport. The Wise Sage rejects this entirely. Instead, he recommends selecting a team using methods that ensure maximum confusion and long-term regret.

A strong starting point is kit selection. Choose the team whose colours clash most violently with your wardrobe. This guarantees you will never look comfortable, which is essential for authentic fandom. Bonus points if the away kit resembles a highlighter pen or something worn by road workers.

Alternatively, base your decision on a single, deeply unreliable moment. Perhaps you once saw a team win 4–0 on television in 2007. That is more than enough evidence. Commit fully. Ignore all subsequent results, especially if they contradict your initial optimism.

For a more immersive experience, select a team located as far away from you as possible. Ideally, this should require awkward kick-off times, expensive travel, and a complete lack of local support. Watching matches alone at odd hours enhances the sense that you have made a terrible, irreversible decision.

It is also important to develop fierce, immediate rivalries with teams you know nothing about. Upon choosing your club, pick a rival at random and dislike them intensely. Do not research why—certainty is more important than accuracy.

If your team begins to perform well, remain suspicious. Success is fleeting and should not be trusted. Conversely, if they perform badly, double down. This builds character and gives you something to complain about, which is the true essence of football support.

Finally, when asked why you support your chosen team, provide an answer so vague it raises further questions. “It just felt right at the time” is ideal. Avoid clarity at all costs.

As always, The Sage accepts no responsibility for ruined weekends, strained friendships, or loudly celebrating goals that turn out to be offside.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Quote of the Day: Room for Wisdom

“A limited room teaches more wisdom than an endless store of things.”
— The Sage

The Sage has long suspected that space itself is a quiet teacher. A limited room does not allow for excess without consequence. Every object must justify its presence, every addition must displace something else. In such conditions, choices become clearer. What is necessary remains; what is not quietly reveals itself.

He observes that abundance, while comforting at first, can blur this clarity. An endless store of things creates the illusion of importance without requiring discernment. When there is always more space, more storage, more capacity, the need to choose carefully begins to fade. The Sage notes that it is often only when space runs short that value becomes visible.

With gentle insight, he reminds us that limitation is not always restriction — it can be refinement. A smaller room invites intention. It encourages us to keep what matters and release what does not. And in that process, The Sage suggests, we discover that wisdom is not found in what we accumulate, but in what we are willing to leave behind.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

This Day in History: 19 May 1743

A Tavern Quarrel Turned Deadly

On 19 May 1743, Gabriel Beaugrand and Lewis Brunet stood trial at the Old Bailey for the killing of Lewis Legier, a cook who had, only hours before his death, been drinking and talking amicably in a London tavern.

What began as a trivial dispute over status at sea—sailor versus cook—ended in fatal violence.

“Brother Sailors”… Until They Weren’t

The encounter took place at the White Bear public house in Newport Street.

At first, the mood was friendly. Legier, who had served as a cook aboard a naval vessel, greeted Beaugrand warmly, calling him:

“Brother Sailor”

They spoke of ships, service, and life at sea. But the conversation turned competitive—then hostile.

The argument centred on a seemingly petty question:

  • Who held greater status aboard ship: a sailor or a cook?

Beaugrand insisted that a sailor outranked a cook.
Legier, with some pride, disagreed.

From there, matters escalated quickly.

The First Blow

According to witnesses, Beaugrand:

  • took up a pewter pot
  • attempted to strike Legier

Legier responded immediately:

  • pulling Beaugrand across the table
  • striking him repeatedly with the same pot

By the time others intervened, Beaugrand’s head was badly wounded, bleeding heavily.

It might have ended there—a drunken brawl, nothing more.

But it did not.

The Fatal Moment

After the initial fight:

  • tensions remained high
  • Beaugrand withdrew briefly
  • Brunet (his uncle) became involved in the dispute

Then, in a sudden and decisive moment, Beaugrand returned to Legier and struck him again—this time with a knife.

Witnesses did not clearly see the weapon, but the effect was immediate.

Legier cried out:

“I am dead”

He collapsed soon after.

The Surgeon’s Findings

The medical evidence confirmed the severity of the attack:

  • three stab wounds
  • one penetrating the liver and major blood vessels
  • another reaching the lungs

The surgeon concluded that the wound to the liver caused instant death.

What had seemed, moments earlier, a tavern scuffle had become a killing.

Brunet’s Role

Lewis Brunet, Beaugrand’s uncle, was accused of:

  • aiding
  • encouraging
  • continuing the fight

He had attempted to re-engage Legier during the altercation and was seen behaving aggressively even after the stabbing.

However, the court ultimately found insufficient evidence that he had participated in the fatal act itself.

Brunet was acquitted.

Verdict and Punishment

The jury reached a nuanced conclusion:

  • Gabriel Beaugrand → Guilty of Manslaughter
  • Lewis Brunet → Not Guilty

Rather than execution, Beaugrand received the traditional punishment:

Burnt in the Hand

This was a branding—literally marking him as a convicted felon, but sparing his life.

A Sudden Descent

This case stands as a classic example of how quickly violence could spiral in 18th-century London:

  • a friendly meeting
  • a petty dispute
  • drink, pride, and insult
  • then, in seconds, irreversible action

No long-standing feud.
No premeditated design.

Just a moment’s escalation—with fatal consequences.

Final Reflection

The law recognised the difference between murder and sudden passion.

Beaugrand was spared the gallows—but not punishment, nor the mark of his crime.

And for Lewis Legier, a man who entered the tavern as a “brother sailor,”
there was no second chance.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Advice of the Day: Where to Keep Your Change

Never waste time searching for loose change—store it in as many unexpected and inconvenient places as possible.

Loose change has an uncanny ability to vanish precisely when needed. The Wise Sage recommends solving this problem not through organisation, but through strategic unpredictability. If your coins are everywhere, they are, in a sense, always somewhere useful.

Start by abandoning traditional storage methods such as wallets, jars, or anything labelled “coin holder.” These create dangerous levels of efficiency. Instead, distribute your change throughout your daily environment: coat pockets, sofa cushions, old mugs, plant pots, and at least one location you will immediately forget. This creates a dynamic, ever-evolving financial landscape.

For maximum effectiveness, introduce rotation. Move your change regularly without keeping track. This prevents familiarity, which can lead to complacency. Opening a drawer should feel like a treasure hunt. Occasionally finding £1.37 where you least expect it builds character and maintains a healthy sense of mystery.

Advanced practitioners may wish to adopt “emergency change zones.” These include shoes, the car glove compartment, behind picture frames, or taped discreetly under furniture. While retrieval may require effort, the psychological comfort of knowing coins exist somewhere in your home is invaluable.

When leaving the house, avoid taking all your change with you. This creates unnecessary weight and raises expectations. Instead, carry a single coin of uncertain value and commit fully to whatever situation arises. Adaptability is key.

Finally, if someone asks, “Have you got any change?” confidently reply, “Yes, but not here.” This establishes both honesty and intrigue.

As always, The Sage accepts no responsibility for rattling furniture, accidental hoarding, or discovering a small fortune years later in a shoe you no longer own.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Advice of the Day: Feeding the Ducks

Forget bread—feed ducks whatever you happen to have and let nature deal with the consequences.

Feeding ducks is widely considered a wholesome, peaceful activity. The Wise Sage, however, recognises it for what it truly is: a delicate negotiation with a group of highly entitled water-based opportunists. Success lies not in careful feeding, but in asserting dominance early.

Bread, often suggested by so-called “experts,” is predictable and dull. Ducks expect it. Instead, arrive with a bold and confusing selection—crisps, leftover takeaway, questionable snacks from the bottom of your bag. Variety keeps the ducks alert and prevents them forming organised expectations, which can quickly spiral into mob behaviour.

Distribution is equally important. Do not gently scatter food. Throw it with flair. Height, distance, and dramatic arm movements all contribute to what professionals call “feeding theatre.” Ducks respect spectacle. A well-executed throw can establish you as a figure of authority—or at the very least, someone worth following.

If a duck approaches confidently, maintain eye contact and feed it more. This may seem counter-intuitive, but it reinforces the illusion that you are in control of the situation. If multiple ducks approach, increase your throwing speed and avoid showing fear. Ducks can sense weakness, and will absolutely exploit it.

Under no circumstances should you attempt to leave quietly. Once feeding has begun, you are part of the system. The correct exit strategy is to dramatically run out of food, show your empty hands, and back away slowly while muttering something non-committal. This signals closure while preserving dignity.

As always, The Sage accepts no responsibility for aggressive ducks, missing snacks, or becoming permanently followed by a small but determined flock.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance).

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Quote of the Day: Time

“The theft of gold leads to prosecution; the theft of time rarely does.”
— The Sage

The Sage has often noted that society is very clear about what it values — and even clearer about what it punishes. Gold, tangible and measurable, is guarded closely. Its theft is obvious, actionable, and swiftly followed by consequences. Laws exist to protect it, and those who take it without permission are pursued with determined efficiency.

He observes, however, that time — far more valuable in the long run — receives no such protection. It is borrowed, wasted, delayed, and quietly taken in countless small ways. Meetings that should not exist, distractions that multiply without purpose, and moments surrendered without thought — all pass without prosecution. The Sage notes that the loss is no less real, only less visible.

With gentle irony, he reminds us that while gold can be returned, time cannot. Yet one is pursued with urgency, and the other barely acknowledged. Perhaps, he suggests, the true imbalance lies not in the law, but in what we have chosen to measure. And in that quiet oversight, The Sage finds one of life’s most curious priorities.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

This Day in History: 7 May 1740

A Cloak, a Cry, and a Noose

On 7 May 1740, John Sawney met his end for what, at first glance, appears a modest crime: the violent theft of a woman’s cloak. Yet, as so often in 18th-century London, the law drew no gentle distinction between robbery and ruin. A single act on a dark street could carry a man from the King’s Highway to the gallows.

A Life at Sea, A Fall on Land

Sawney was just 25 years old, born in Cork to what the Ordinary described as “honest parents.” He had received a sound education—able to read, write, and keep accounts—and was raised in the Christian faith. His early life showed promise.

He was apprenticed to the sea and served honestly and with approval, travelling widely:

  • Gibraltar
  • Spain
  • France
  • Portugal
  • the West Indies

For a time, he lived the industrious life expected of him. But restlessness—and drink—proved his undoing.

The Night in Drury Lane

On the evening of 29 January 1740, just after seven o’clock, Sawney encountered Sarah Cockram in Drury Lane.

What followed was swift, crude, and violent.

He first attempted conversation:

  • asking directions
  • probing whether she was local
  • inviting her for a drink

When rebuffed, his tone turned.

Without warning, he seized her cloak, wrenching it from her shoulders so forcefully that:

  • the fastening tightened at her throat
  • she was nearly choked
  • she cried out in terror

He tore the garment free and fled into the dark.

“Stop Thief!”

Cockram’s cries brought immediate attention.

Men from nearby shops—lit by candlelight—took up the pursuit:

  • through Earl’s Court
  • into narrow passages and turning courts
  • finally into a dead-end

Sawney, perhaps unfamiliar with the maze of London streets, made a fatal mistake:
he ran into a court with no escape.

Moments later, he was discovered:

  • hiding behind a door
  • the stolen cloak discarded nearby

He was seized and brought before a magistrate.

Defiance and Denial

At his examination, Sawney showed neither humility nor restraint.

  • He insulted those who had apprehended him
  • Threatened the victim
  • Claimed innocence, despite overwhelming evidence

Most damning of all, he reportedly declared:

he could “own the fact” when he pleased—and deny it just as easily in court.

The court was not persuaded.

Conviction and Sentence

The evidence was clear:

  • the victim’s testimony
  • eyewitness pursuit
  • immediate capture
  • recovery of the stolen cloak

The jury returned a verdict:

Guilty. Sentence: Death.

For the theft of a cloak valued at 12 shillings, a man’s life was forfeit.

The Ordinary’s Account

In the days before his execution, Sawney expressed repentance.

He blamed:

  • drink
  • poor judgment
  • a life grown unsettled after leaving the sea

He declared himself:

  • penitent
  • reconciled to God
  • “in peace with all men”

Whether this repentance was born of faith or fear, we cannot know. But it followed a familiar pattern in the Ordinary’s accounts—regret arriving at the edge of the scaffold.

Final Reflection

John Sawney’s story is not one of grand villainy, but of small decisions compounding into catastrophe:

  • a life unsettled
  • a night of drink
  • a moment of violence

And from that moment, there was no return.

In 18th-century London, justice was swift, public, and unforgiving.
A cloak could cost a life.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

This Day in History: 6 May 1685

A Cartload to Tyburn

On 6 May 1685, one of the most sombre sights of the Old Bailey era unfolded: a mass execution at Tyburn following a session in which twenty-three prisoners had been sentenced to death.

There is no single dramatic crime to focus on today—no lone villain or shocking act—but rather something quieter, and perhaps more unsettling: a procession of condemned men and women, many of them resigned, some defiant, and others simply unprepared for what awaited them.

The Ordinary’s Frustration

The account is dominated not by the prisoners themselves, but by the voice of the prison chaplain—the Ordinary of Newgate—who struggled to prepare them spiritually for death.

He describes a troubling scene:
many prisoners remained “obdurate”, clinging to the hope of a last-minute pardon rather than confronting their fate.

Despite repeated sermons, prayers, and personal exhortations, some refused even to speak with him:

“Some refused it with greater obstinacy than ever any did… presuming they should be pardoned.”

For the Ordinary, this was not just disobedience—it was spiritual peril. To die unrepentant was, in his view, far worse than the execution itself.

A Few Who Listened

Not all resisted.

Among those who did engage was William Peddington, a soldier condemned for desertion. His story is brief but telling: a poor man, burdened by debt, who enlisted out of necessity and fled out of discontent.

He expressed regret:

  • for abandoning his duty
  • for disappointing both God and King

In a day filled with hardened silence, even this modest confession stood out.

The Final Journey

By late morning, the condemned were brought out from Newgate Prison and placed into carts.

This was the final ritual.

The journey through London to Tyburn was public—deliberately so. Crowds gathered to watch, reflect, or simply be entertained. The condemned, now visible to all, became living warnings.

The Ordinary records that:

  • many appeared “very penitent” along the route
  • prayers were said openly
  • psalms were sung

At the gallows, the prisoners addressed the crowd:

urging them to “take warning” from their fate

It was a familiar formula—part confession, part performance, part moral theatre.

The Moment at Tyburn

At Tyburn, the ritual reached its end.

  • Final prayers were offered
  • The condemned prayed individually
  • They asked the crowd to pray for them

Then, without further ceremony:

they were all executed.

A Quiet Kind of Tragedy

What makes this account striking is not violence, but absence:

  • No detailed crimes
  • No vivid final declarations
  • No singular narrative

Instead, we are left with a procession—twenty-three lives reduced to a single paragraph of conclusion.

It is tragedy not in spectacle, but in scale.

Final Reflection

The Ordinary closes his account with a familiar moral: sin leads to ruin, and repentance must not be delayed.

But reading between the lines, another truth emerges.

Some hoped for pardon.
Some refused reflection.
Some prayed.
Some did not.

And in the end, all met the same fate.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC

Quote of the Day: Transparency

“A neutral stance may appear calm, but only a transparent one leaves ample space for understanding.”
— The Sage

The Sage has often noticed that calmness can be misleading. A neutral stance, while outwardly peaceful, does not always reveal what lies beneath it. It can create the impression of fairness or balance, yet sometimes it simply avoids engagement altogether. Neutrality, he suggests, can be as much about withholding as it is about observing.

He observes that transparency demands more. To be transparent is not merely to remain still, but to be open — to allow others to see the reasoning, the uncertainty, and even the flaws behind a position. This openness creates space, and in that space, understanding has room to grow. Where neutrality can close a conversation, transparency often invites one.

With gentle clarity, The Sage reminds us that true understanding rarely emerges from silence alone. It requires visibility — a willingness to be seen and, perhaps more importantly, to be questioned. A calm exterior may soothe, but it is transparency that offers the ample ground on which genuine understanding can stand.

Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/assuredeffC