This Day in History: 29 April 1724

Thomas Burden and the Robbery on Hounslow Common

On 29 April 1724, Thomas Burden faced the final consequence of a crime he himself called the work of “the Devil.” Convicted of violently robbing an elderly man named William Zouch, Burden was executed after a case that mixed highway robbery, failed excuses, and a long, bitter reflection on a wasted life.

Unlike many hardened criminals who appeared before the Old Bailey, Burden was not a young rogue or a repeat offender. He was around fifty years old, a former sailor and soldier who had travelled widely, survived war, and escaped slavery abroad—only to end his life on the gallows for robbing a vulnerable old man in Twickenham.


The Victim: William Zouch

William Zouch was elderly, frail, and lived largely alone in the parish of Twittenham (Twickenham). On 3 February 1724, Thomas Burden entered his home around noon and began forcing conversation upon him, asking whether neighbours often visited.

It soon became clear that Burden had not come for company.

Drawing a concealed iron blade—a “tuck” hidden inside his walking stick—he pressed it against the old man’s chest and demanded money.

Zouch later told the court:

“He presently drew a Tuck out of it, and presented it to my Breast… and threatned me, if I did not immediately tell him where my Money was, he would run me through.”

Terrified, Zouch explained that he was poor, and that the 31 shillings he possessed were all he had—mostly charity given to him in old age.

Burden did not care.

He forced the old man into a chair, cut down a line hanging nearby, and tied him tightly in place before taking the money and leaving him helpless in his own home.


Escape, Pursuit, and Capture

Burden’s criminal career as a robber was not a polished one.

Though he tied Zouch up, he did it badly. The victim managed to free one arm, reach into his pocket for a knife, cut the cord, and escape.

He immediately alerted neighbours.

A local carpenter named Greenbury had seen Burden behaving suspiciously near the house and watched him leave “in a great Hurry.” When Zouch cried that he had been robbed, Greenbury borrowed a passing gentleman’s horse and set off in pursuit.

He soon caught up with Burden.

Fearing the man might be armed with pistols, Greenbury kept some distance until another man, Whittington, joined him. When Greenbury finally grabbed Burden by the collar, Burden again pulled the concealed sword from his walking stick and made several lunges at him.

Greenbury defended himself only with a horse whip, managing to slash Burden across the face.

Eventually Burden realised escape was impossible. He threw down the weapon and surrendered.

Even then, he tried to buy freedom by offering back the stolen 31 shillings.

It did not work.


The Trial at the Old Bailey

At the Old Bailey on 15 April 1724, the evidence was overwhelming.

William Zouch identified him.
Greenbury described the chase and arrest.
Whittington confirmed the capture.
The stolen money was found on Burden in the exact denominations Zouch described: one five-shilling piece, four half-crowns, and the rest in shillings and sixpences.

Burden’s defence was weak and almost absurd.

He claimed he had merely gone inside to light his pipe and drink “2 or 3 Pints of Cyder,” and that the old man had somehow lent him the money voluntarily.

He even remarked that although Zouch was “an old Man he was but a young Thief.”

The jury was not impressed.

They found him guilty.

Sentence: Death.


A Life of Missed Chances

What makes Burden’s case especially striking is the long account he gave while awaiting execution.

He said he had been born in Dorsetshire and sent to sea while still young. He sailed repeatedly “up the Streights” and into dangerous waters, surviving conflicts with Turks, Africans, and the French.

He claimed that before every battle he prayed sincerely, weeping for his sins and promising God he would change his ways.

But afterward, he said:

“The Devil was so powerful that he tempted me to deviate from my Resolutions.”

He blamed Satan, fate, bad company, and drink—but also himself.

He described being offered a respectable and profitable life in Aleppo, where a gentleman had offered him money and a permanent position if he would stay in Asia.

Instead, he chose the rough life at sea and the company of swearing companions.

Later, after military service in Flanders, he returned to England and worked successfully at his original trade in St Giles.

By his own account, life had been improving.

Then came one unlucky day at Hounslow.


“The Devil Put the Thought in My Mind”

Burden explained that after spending a night drinking with an old military acquaintance—a corporal stationed near Hounslow—he walked across the common the next day and began speaking about old William Zouch, who lived mostly alone.

After drinking heavily, he said:

“The Devil put the wicked Thought in my Mind.”

He decided to rob the old man.

Even in confession, he admitted how clumsy he had been.

He tied the victim badly.
He fled across open common “visible for many Miles together.”
He failed to hide in woods or take safer roads.

He described himself as a man entirely unskilled in villainy.

Yet clumsy or not, the crime was enough to send him to the gallows.


Facing Death

At first, Burden clung desperately to hope for mercy.

Even as an older man with no children and little to lose, he could not let go of life.

Eventually, though, he accepted his fate.

He said:

“It was a most deplorable Thing, to live so long like a Man, and then at last to die like a Beast.”

Before execution, he declared that by suffering in this life he hoped to avoid punishment in the next:

“Having satisfied Justice, and expiated my Crimes with my Blood.”

On 29 April 1724, Thomas Burden was hanged.

After years surviving wars and foreign dangers, he died not by cannon, sword, or slavery—but for robbing thirty-one shillings from an old man in his own kitchen.


Why This Case Matters

Thomas Burden’s story is not simply a robbery case.

It is a study in late regret.

He was not a desperate youth but a man who had survived half a lifetime of hardship, only to ruin himself with one brutal and foolish crime.

The hidden sword-stick, the tied chair, the desperate attempt to bribe his captors, and the long self-justifying confessions all make this a vivid portrait of a man who understood—far too late—that the smallest evil choice can outweigh an entire life.

Sometimes history’s tragedies are not grand conspiracies.

Sometimes they begin with a drink, a bad idea, and an old man sitting alone at home.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

This Day in History: 25 April 1746

Matthew Henderson and the Murder of His Mistress

On 25 April 1746, nineteen-year-old Matthew Henderson was hanged for one of the most baffling domestic murders of the eighteenth century.

He had not killed an enemy, nor a cruel employer, nor a stranger in a drunken quarrel. He murdered the very woman who had helped his poor Scottish family, brought him into her household, and intended to provide for his future.

Even Henderson himself struggled to explain why he had done it.

His repeated answer was simple and chilling:

“I had no intent, no design, no meaning in the murder.”


A Servant Raised by Kindness

Matthew Henderson was born in North Berwick, East Lothian, in Scotland, around 1727.

His father was poor and had several children to support, while his mother took in nurse-children to help the family survive. One of those children happened to be the niece of Elizabeth Dalrymple.

Through visiting her niece, Mrs Dalrymple came to know the Henderson family and took a liking to young Matthew, who appeared well-behaved and respectable. She resolved that when he was old enough, she would bring him into service and, if he proved trustworthy, help establish him in life.

For five years he served the Dalrymple household.

By all accounts, he was quiet, capable, and not known for vice. He insisted he was not a drunkard, not a gambler, and not given to bad company.

Which made what happened next almost impossible to understand.


The Night of the Murder

On 25 March 1746, the household maid was absent from the house.

Henderson later said this absence mattered greatly.

That night, while preparing for bed, he suddenly remembered there was a chopping knife downstairs in the kitchen.

He went down and picked it up.

At first, he claimed, he did not know what he meant to do with it. But standing there with the knife in his hand, he began thinking of his mistress.

He walked upstairs to her bedchamber.

He admitted he hesitated. He felt fear. He stood still for a moment.

Then, as he later described it, “the temptation growing upon him” overcame him.

Entering in darkness, he struck.

His first blow missed.

The next reached her.

Elizabeth Dalrymple cried out:

“Lord, what is this!”

He struck again and left her bleeding to death on the floor.


After the Killing

After leaving his mistress dying, Henderson returned to his own bed and threw himself upon it, horrified by what he had done.

He said he kept repeating to himself:

“Lord, I must now be hanged.”

He then took the bloody knife and threw it into the privy.

Only after the murder did he decide to rob the house.

He stole money and valuables, later claiming the theft had not been the original motive at all, but something he thought of afterwards in panic and confusion.

The following morning, when the maid returned and discovered blood on the stairs and Mrs Dalrymple’s body upstairs, Henderson helped raise the alarm.

He even offered to be the messenger sent to inform his master, William Dalrymple, who was away at Richmond.

At first suspicion fell elsewhere.

But Henderson’s own behaviour soon betrayed him.


The Confession

When brought before a magistrate, he denied everything.

But under questioning, contradictions appeared, and suspicion quickly hardened into certainty.

Eventually he made a full confession.

He pleaded guilty both to the murder and to stealing from the house.

He was charged not simply with murder, but with petty treason—the killing of a mistress by her servant, considered a particularly grave betrayal of social and moral order.

This was seen as more than homicide.

It was treachery.


Why Did He Do It?

This was the question that obsessed everyone.

Even the Ordinary of Newgate seemed unable to believe there was no clear motive.

Had Mrs Dalrymple mistreated him?

No.

Had she denied him wages?

Not exactly.

Had he planned robbery first?

He insisted no.

Eventually Henderson revealed one incident.

A week before the murder, while curling his master’s hair, he accidentally stepped on Mrs Dalrymple’s toes. She later rebuked him sharply, struck him on the head, and threatened to dismiss him.

He replied angrily:

“You shall not turn me away, for I will go of my own accord.”

Yet he repeatedly swore this was not revenge.

Only when he stood with the knife in his hand did the memory suddenly return to him, and, he said, it strengthened the terrible temptation.

He also spoke of violent mood swings—periods of excessive excitement followed by deep gloom and withdrawal. He wondered if he had inherited some form of madness from an aunt known to lose her senses.

Many believed the crime was the result of a sudden frenzy rather than cold calculation.

But the law made little distinction.


Sentence of Death

Henderson was convicted and sentenced to die.

He showed no attempt to escape responsibility.

When someone suggested he should not plead guilty, he refused:

“What, have I not committed a crime great enough already, without adding to it a lie?”

He spent his final weeks in Newgate in prayer, attended by Anglican clergy and dissenting ministers alike.

Though still very young—and already married—he showed what witnesses described as sincere penitence.

His wife visited him daily.

He repeatedly returned to one thought:

that if the maid had only stayed home that night, the murder might never have happened.

She would have locked herself into the kitchen.

He would never have reached the knife.

Again and again he said:

“Oh! would to God she had but stayed at home.”


Execution Day

On 25 April 1746, exactly one month after the murder, Matthew Henderson was taken to execution.

Crowds gathered in enormous numbers.

As the cart approached Tyburn, it was deliberately routed past his master’s house near Cavendish Square—a final grim reminder of the life he had destroyed.

He refused wine before death, saying:

“It is no time for me to drink.”

At the gallows he prayed devoutly, received the sacrament, confessed the justice of his sentence, and mounted the ladder calmly.

When he was turned off, being light in body, he struggled for some time. His legs were pulled and blows were struck to his chest to hasten death.

Afterwards, his body was carried near Edgware and hung in chains—a gibbeted warning to others.

The Ordinary noted grimly that Henderson had survived his mistress by exactly one month.


Why This Case Still Matters

Matthew Henderson’s crime disturbed people because it seemed to have no satisfying explanation.

He was not a hardened criminal.

He was not abused.

He had been trusted, helped, and treated kindly.

Yet he walked upstairs one night with a kitchen knife and destroyed everything.

The case terrified eighteenth-century readers because it suggested that violence did not always come from greed or hatred.

Sometimes it came from something far less understandable.

A moment.

A temptation.

A thought allowed to grow too long.

And for that, both mistress and servant were dead within a month.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

Quote of the Day: Philosophy

“A genuine philosophy has little interest in hierarchy; truth rarely sits at the head of the table.”
The Sage


The Sage has always been suspicious of tables with obvious “best seats.” Wherever hierarchy becomes too important, conversation tends to shrink and performance takes its place. People begin speaking upward instead of honestly, and truth — shy creature that it is — quietly excuses itself from the room. A genuine philosophy, he believes, is far less concerned with rank than with sincerity.

He observes that wisdom does not automatically arrive wearing expensive shoes or sitting nearest the chairman. Insight has an irritating habit of appearing wherever people are paying attention, regardless of title or status. The Sage notes that some of the clearest truths are spoken from the far end of the table, often by the person everyone else has underestimated.

With gentle irony, he reminds us that philosophy begins not with authority, but with questions. Hierarchy asks who is permitted to speak; truth asks whether anyone is willing to listen. And in that distinction, The Sage finds the difference between order and understanding. Genuine wisdom, he suggests, rarely needs the best seat — only an honest room.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

Advice of the Day: Never Losing Your TV Remote

Never lose your TV remote again by attaching it to a broom handle and carrying it everywhere like a ceremonial staff.

the sage

The television remote has a mysterious ability to vanish the moment you need it most. It slips into sofa cushions, disappears under furniture, and occasionally enters what science can only describe as another dimension. The Wise Sage believes the answer is simple: make it physically impossible to ignore.

By firmly taping the remote to the end of a broom handle, you create both a practical locating system and an object of great personal authority. No longer a small plastic inconvenience, your remote becomes a noble staff of entertainment control, visible from anywhere in the house and impossible to accidentally sit on.

For added security, the Sage recommends decorating the handle with ribbons or small bells. This ensures that every channel change is accompanied by a sense of ceremony and a faint jingling noise, which also helps with location during moments of panic.

If guests question why you are entering the lounge carrying what appears to be a wizard’s sceptre with batteries, simply say, “I take television seriously.”

As always, The Sage accepts no responsibility for damaged lampshades, accidental poking, or becoming far too emotionally attached to your remote staff.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

This Day in History: 24 April 1723

The Mystery of Anne Bristol on Smallberry Green

On 24 April 1723, five men stood at the Old Bailey accused of the murder of Anne Bristol, a woman found dying on Smallberry Green near Isleworth after a night of drinking, arguments, and desperate cries for help in the darkness.

Witnesses heard her scream for mercy. Surgeons found broken ribs, bruises, and injuries they believed could not have been caused by a wagon accident. Confessions were read in court. Yet, after hearing everything, the jury acquitted all five men.

It remains one of the most troubling and uncertain cases of the eighteenth-century Old Bailey.


A Night at the Red Lion

Anne Bristol spent the evening of 22 January 1723 at the Red Lion on Smallberry Green, drinking with four watermen: George Smith, Joseph Buckingham, James Simpkin, and Samuel Loyd.

Witnesses described the men as being extremely familiar with her. Buckingham reportedly kissed her repeatedly, calling her “his wife” and “his dear,” while Simpkin also kissed her. They remained drinking together until around eleven o’clock at night.

Elizabeth Ruffin, the landlady, later stated that Anne paid part of the reckoning herself before leaving the tavern with the four men.

This would be the last time she was seen well.


Cries in the Dark

Later that night, neighbours were disturbed by screams coming from Smallberry Green.

Susan Willis, who lived nearby, heard a woman crying out that “the men were very rude with her.” She then heard a male voice threaten:

“If you will not yield, I will throw you into the pond.”

Another man reportedly shouted that if she had consented, “it would have been all over by that time.”

When Susan called from her window asking what was happening, one of the men chillingly replied that they were abusing a woman against her will.

Then came the cry:

“Murder!”

Other witnesses heard similar cries between midnight and two in the morning. Waggoners passing through the darkness heard Anne begging for help.

“Waggoner, waggoner, for God’s sake help!”

One driver dismissed her as drunk and drove on.

Another heard her say she was lost and trying to get to Brentford.

No one stopped.


Found Dying on the Green

The next morning Anne Bristol was discovered on the ground in dreadful condition.

Her clothes were torn and filthy. She had no cap on her head. She was bruised, weak, and barely able to move.

When asked what had happened, she gave several desperate answers.

To some she cried:

“O, the Watermen! The Watermen!”

To others she blamed:

“The wagon! The cursed wagon has killed me!”

Witnesses later said she begged to be taken home and put to bed, saying the woman of the house had turned her out “to her destruction.”

She also told one woman that three men had held her down while a fourth tried to force himself upon her.

Within minutes of being carried into a barn for shelter, Anne Bristol died.


The Surgeons’ Verdict

The medical evidence transformed the case.

Surgeons James Bothune and Henry Parsons examined the body and found terrible internal injuries.

Her eye was blackened. Her elbow was broken. Her wrists, knees, and ankles were badly damaged. Her ribs—five of them—were broken, with one rib forced inward against the lungs. There was a pint of coagulated blood inside her chest.

There were bruises on her thighs and chest, scratches on her hands and knees, and signs of violent handling around her wrists and ankles.

Most importantly, both surgeons firmly stated that these injuries did not look like the result of a wagon wheel.

If a loaded wagon had run over her, they argued, the damage would have been far more obvious externally. Bones such as the collarbone would also likely have been shattered. Instead, the injuries looked more like the result of kicking, stamping, or deliberate violence.

That medical opinion gave the prosecution its strongest weapon.


The Confessions

The Crown also introduced statements allegedly made by the accused.

Joseph Buckingham reportedly admitted that George Smith had lain with Anne Bristol on the Green, while the others tried to do the same. He said Samuel Loyd kicked her when she refused him.

James Simpkin’s earlier examination similarly stated that Smith had lain with her and that he saw Loyd kick her while she was on the ground.

George Smith himself admitted being with Anne that night.

To the prosecution, this painted a clear picture of drunken assault leading to fatal injuries.


The Defence: It Was the Wagon

The defence insisted Anne’s death was an accident.

They argued she was heavily drunk, had been falling over all evening, and had even been pulled from a ditch earlier that day.

Several witnesses claimed they heard Anne herself repeatedly say that a wagon had run over her.

One wagon driver testified that she grabbed hold of his horse and refused to let go, despite warnings she would be dragged beneath the wheels. Another woman riding in the wagon said she felt the wheel pass over “something,” and feared it had been Anne.

Other local witnesses insisted she was known for drunkenness and disorderly behaviour and claimed she had said herself that the wagon was responsible.

The defence argued that the men had merely drunk with her and left her behind.

Nothing more.


An Unexpected Verdict

Despite the dramatic accusations, the cries for help, the medical evidence, and the supposed confessions, the jury acquitted all five men.

George Smith, Joseph Buckingham, Samuel Loyd, James Simpkin, and William Hassel all walked free.

Why?

Possibly because Anne herself gave conflicting accounts. Possibly because drunkenness clouded every witness. Possibly because the jury preferred the simpler explanation of a tragic wagon accident over a coordinated violent assault.

Or perhaps, as often happened in eighteenth-century justice, certainty simply could not be reached.

But the result leaves an uneasy feeling.

A woman died in agony on Smallberry Green.

Many heard her cry.

No one was punished.

William Hassel remains the most uncertain figure in the case. Unlike George Smith, Buckingham, Loyd, and Simpkin, he was not strongly identified as one of the men drinking with Anne Bristol at the Red Lion or as one of those heard threatening her on Smallberry Green. Instead, his name appears most clearly in the grim aftermath. Witnesses stated that when Anne was found badly injured the following morning, it was William Hassel who helped fetch the wheelbarrow, and he assisted Hardin Ruffin and George Ockram in lifting her into it and moving her towards the bridge. This placed him at the centre of the final moments before her death. The prosecution appears to have believed that either he had been involved in the assault itself, or that he had helped the others by removing Anne rather than seeking proper help for her. Yet no witness could firmly place him among the attackers, and no confession directly accused him of violence. In the end, like the other four men, he was acquitted, leaving his true role in Anne Bristol’s death one of the lingering mysteries of the case.


Why This Case Still Matters

This case reveals how difficult justice could be in early eighteenth-century England—especially when the victim was poor, female, and socially vulnerable.

Anne Bristol’s final hours were witnessed by many, yet no one intervened in time.

Even with surgeons giving strong evidence of violence, the legal system hesitated.

It is a haunting reminder that truth in the Old Bailey was not always enough to secure a conviction.

Sometimes, even with cries of murder in the night, nobody paid for the crime.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

Quote of the Day: Preoccupation

“Preoccupation is what happens when the mind keeps walking north while the body remains in the same area.”
The Sage


The Sage has often noticed that people can travel great distances without ever leaving the room. A mind caught in preoccupation is always elsewhere — rehearsing conversations, revisiting mistakes, or wandering toward imagined futures. Meanwhile, the body remains faithfully present, making tea, answering emails, or standing in the kitchen wondering why it came there in the first place.

He observes that “north” is often less a direction than a symbol — the place we believe clarity lives. We tell ourselves that if we could only reach that next point, solve that next problem, or arrive at that imagined destination, peace would follow. Yet preoccupation turns every present moment into merely a waiting room for somewhere else.

With gentle humour, The Sage reminds us that the danger is not movement, but absence. If the mind is always walking north, it rarely notices the life happening in its current area. Wisdom, he suggests, is not always found by pressing onward, but sometimes by standing still long enough to realise you have already arrived somewhere worth noticing.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

Advice of the Day: Making the Bed

Save time making the bed by simply stapling the duvet to the mattress and sleeping underneath it like a cave.

the sage

Making the bed every morning is one of life’s great repetitive insults. You straighten the sheets, fluff the pillows, and by nightfall, it all looks as though a small argument took place there. The Wise Sage recommends a more permanent solution.

By firmly attaching the duvet to the mattress with a staple gun, you eliminate all future bed-making forever. No more slipping corners, no more wandering covers, and no more waking up wrapped like a distressed burrito. Simply slide underneath each night and emerge again in the morning like a very tired badger.

For added efficiency, the Sage suggests also securing the pillows in place. This prevents midnight pillow migration and creates the reassuring sensation of sleeping inside a well-organised filing system.

If visitors question the visible upholstery hardware, simply describe it as “Scandinavian sleep design.” People will assume it is expensive and stop asking.

As always, The Sage accepts no responsibility for punctured bedding, startled house guests, or explaining to A&E how your pyjamas became structurally attached to the bed.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

This Day in History – 22 April 1789

Sarah Natchell and the Missing Fortune at Bartholomew Coffee House

In April 1789, the Old Bailey heard the case of Sarah Natchell, a young servant accused of stealing money and household goods from her employer, Joseph Crank, proprietor of the Bartholomew Coffee House in West Smithfield. What began as a suspicious “break-in” soon unravelled into a tale of deception, hidden gold, midnight coach rides, and a servant whose sudden illness raised more suspicion than sympathy.

Though the prosecution alleged she had stolen over £45 in cash, gold coins, silver, and household linen, the jury ultimately convicted her only of stealing several marked tea-cloths—known in the trial as “clouts.” Even so, because she had stolen from her master’s household while in service, the punishment was severe: seven years’ transportation beyond the seas, eventually to New South Wales aboard the Lady Juliana.


The Coffee House Theft

Joseph Crank ran the busy Bartholomew Coffee House in West Smithfield, a respectable establishment where money regularly passed through the bar and till. Sarah Natchell had been employed there as a servant for only about a month.

On the night of 13 March 1789, she went to bed before her employers. Mr. Crank, preparing to retire shortly after midnight, noticed something odd: light still showed through the dining-room window. His wife, Jane, went downstairs and found one of the windows open. She shut and fastened it, and the couple went to bed.

At around half past six the next morning, Sarah came hammering violently at the door, announcing that the house had been broken into.

She claimed:

“The house was broke open… the dining-room window was open, and there were thieves in the house.”

Mr. Crank rushed downstairs and found the bar disturbed. The till lay on the floor. A bowl used for silver and gold coins had been overturned. Bills and papers were scattered everywhere. Yet strangely, some large sums of money remained untouched—£70 stored elsewhere in the bar and another substantial quantity left on a shelf.

What was missing, however, was significant: 22½ guineas in gold, £20 14s 6d in silver, £1 5s in halfpence, and several household cloths and linens.

It did not look like the work of ordinary thieves.


Suspicion Falls on Sally

At first, Crank hesitated to accuse Sarah. But her behaviour over the following days made him uneasy.

She asked to go out unusually often, stayed out late, and on one occasion returned near eleven at night after the city’s illumination celebrations. Soon afterward, she complained she was ill and took to her bed, saying:

“The town did not agree with her.”

Then, quite suddenly, she announced she would leave and “go into the country.”

She called a coach herself, loaded up a trunk and hat-box, and departed.

Crank followed the coach.

It first stopped in James Street, Bedford Row, where a footman came to the coach several times. Then she was driven to the Dolphin public house in Red Lion Street, Holborn.

This was enough. Crank now believed the “burglary” had never happened at all.


Drunk in Bed at the Dolphin

The landlady of the Dolphin, Helen Parry, gave evidence that Sarah had first visited days earlier, ordering repeated servings of brandy and water, cakes, and oranges, and asking for needle, thread, and twine while secretly making up parcels.

Later she returned in a hackney coach carrying boxes.

She asked to leave them there and summoned a gentleman’s servant to meet her privately. Afterward, a porter arrived and moved the luggage elsewhere.

By now the police were involved.

On 21 March, officer Charles Jealous arrested Sarah at a house in Little James Street, Oxford Road, where she was dining comfortably with another woman and two soldiers.

In her pocket, tied inside a silk handkerchief, he found:

  • 17 guineas
  • 8 half-guineas
  • £2 9s 6d in silver

Further searches uncovered more money, new silver teaspoons, stockings, an umbrella, and—most importantly—ten tea-cloths belonging to Mrs. Crank, identifiable by a special iron mark she herself had made.

The supposed robbery had not gone very far.


Her Defence

Sarah did not deny possessing the goods, but she offered a dramatic explanation.

She claimed the money had not been stolen at all. Instead, she said it had been given to her by her “young master,” Lieutenant Richard Morgan, who had supposedly fathered her child before leaving for Bengal with his regiment. According to Sarah, the money was intended to maintain the child.

As for the cloths, she insisted they were hers and that she had even promised some to a friend, Sarah Brown, who testified she had indeed seen bits of cloth in Sarah’s box.

Several character witnesses described her as previously respectable and hardworking.

But the court was unconvinced.

Even if the greater theft could not be fully proved, the marked tea-cloths were enough.


The Verdict

The jury delivered a compromise verdict:

Guilty — of stealing the clouts only.

She escaped the gallows, but the Recorder made clear that servants who betrayed household trust were considered especially dangerous.

He told her:

“The offence of a servant breaking that trust reposed in them, is so dangerous to the peace and security of individuals, that it is the rule of the Court to treat it with the utmost rigour of the law.”

Sentence followed:

Transported for Seven Years

Sarah Natchell was sentenced to be:

“Transported beyond the seas for the term of seven years.”

Records later show her destination as:

Colony: New South Wales

Ship: Lady Juliana

The Lady Juliana would become famous as one of the first convict transport ships carrying women to Australia.

For a servant who claimed she merely wanted to leave London because “the town did not agree with her,” she ended up going rather farther than expected.


Why This Case Matters

The case of Sarah Natchell shows how Georgian courts treated servant theft with particular seriousness. A burglary by a stranger was one thing; betrayal from inside the household was another entirely.

It also reveals how suspicious behaviour—late nights, secret meetings, sudden illness, and hurried departures—could prove as damaging as direct evidence.

Though the jury spared her from conviction on the full theft of over £45, the marked tea-cloths were enough to change her life forever.

In eighteenth-century London, stealing your master’s linens could send you to the other side of the world.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

Advice of the Day: Exercising at Home

Maximise your home workout by replacing all your furniture with things you can trip over.

the sage

Many people struggle to find time and motivation to exercise. The Wise Sage believes the problem lies not in effort, but in environment. A truly effective workout should be unavoidable.

Begin by rearranging your home into a carefully engineered obstacle course. Chairs at odd angles, books on the floor, and at least one inexplicable object in every doorway will ensure that every journey — whether to the kitchen or the sofa — becomes a full-body challenge.

For added intensity, the Sage recommends performing everyday tasks at speed. Making tea becomes a sprint, answering the door a hurdle event, and locating the remote control an endurance trial. Over time, your reflexes will sharpen, your balance will improve, and your confidence in walking normally will diminish entirely.

If you wish to incorporate strength training, simply carry increasingly unnecessary objects from room to room. A chair, a lamp, or perhaps the entire contents of a drawer will provide excellent resistance.

As always, The Sage accepts no responsibility for stubbed toes, unexpected collisions, or explaining to guests why your house appears to be actively fighting back.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)

This Day in History: April 21st, 1680

“Jealousy and Cruelty at the Old Bailey”

On this day in 1680, two very different crimes were heard at the Old Bailey—yet both ended in the same grim conclusion:

A sentence of death.

One case spoke of jealousy, rivalry, and fatal confrontation.
The other revealed a crime of shocking cruelty against a child.

Together, they offer a stark reminder of the breadth—and brutality—of early modern justice.


The Killing of John Jacob

The first case concerned Edward Harrison, accused of murdering John Jacob in King Street, Westminster.

What lay behind the violence was not random conflict, but something far more personal.


A Rivalry Turned Deadly

Evidence presented in court revealed a long-standing feud between the two men.

At the heart of it was Jacob’s belief that Harrison had been too familiar with his wife.

This suspicion led to repeated quarrels, threats, and escalating hostility.

According to witnesses:

  • Harrison had previously lain in wait for Jacob
  • He had attacked him on earlier occasions
  • And had openly threatened to end his life—or lose his own

The situation had been building for some time.


The Final Encounter

On the night in question, tensions reached their breaking point.

After another incident involving Jacob’s wife—one that deeply angered him—Jacob reportedly vowed revenge.

Later that evening, at around ten o’clock, the two men met.

What followed was a violent confrontation.


A Fight to the Death

Harrison claimed that Jacob drew first, attacking him with his sword.

Forced to retreat into his own house, Harrison was pursued.

With no further room to escape, he drew his weapon and defended himself.

In the struggle that followed, Jacob received two deep wounds to the chest, each described as mortal, and fell dead at Harrison’s feet.


The Verdict

Despite the history of threats and the apparent aggression of the deceased, the jury reached a measured conclusion:

Guilty of manslaughter.

Even so, in the harsh legal climate of the time, this still carried the ultimate penalty.


🔎 Trial Echo

“Two mortal wounds on the breast… made him fall breathless at his feet.”


A Crime of Unspeakable Cruelty

The second case, tried at the same sitting, was of an entirely different—and far more disturbing—nature.

William Harding stood accused of the rape of a young girl, Sarah Southy, aged just seven or eight.


Lured and Attacked

Harding was said to have lured the child into a dark cellar with the promise of apples.

Once there, he committed what the court described as a “detestable villainy.”

The evidence revealed that the child had suffered severe harm.

For some time, she remained silent—fearful of punishment from her mother.


The Truth Revealed

Eventually, the extent of her suffering forced her to speak.

Her mother, upon learning what had happened, immediately sought medical assistance.

Surgeons examined the child and concluded that she had indeed been violently assaulted. She had also (tragically) contracted the venereal disease.

Her own account confirmed the attack.


A Pattern of Depravity

Further testimony painted a deeply troubling picture of Harding’s character.

Witnesses described him as:

  • A habitual offender
  • Engaged in acts of extreme moral corruption
  • And suffering from a venereal disease, the symptoms of which were observed upon examination

The case left little room for doubt.


The Verdict

The jury found Harding:

Guilty of rape.

Like Harrison, he too was sentenced to death.


Justice in 1680

These two cases, heard side by side, reveal the stark realities of justice in the late 17th century:

  • Violence born of jealousy
  • Crimes of calculated cruelty
  • And a legal system that dealt with both in the same final way

Though the circumstances differed greatly, both men stood before the same court…
and faced the same end.


Why This Day Matters

April 21st, 1680, serves as a sobering reflection on:

  • The consequences of unchecked anger and suspicion
  • The vulnerability of the young and powerless
  • And the severity of early modern punishment

It is a day that shows both the human causes of crime
and the unyielding nature of justice in the Old Bailey.


Thank you for reading my writings. If you’d like to, you can buy me a coffee for just £1 and I will think of you while writing my next post! Just hit the link below…. (thanks in advance)